Did Jesus of Nazareth really live in the first century, or is He just a myth invented by later Christians? You don’t need to open a single Bible verse to answer that. The truth is, even His enemies wrote about Him.
While the New Testament provides the clearest picture of Jesus’ life and ministry, it’s not the only ancient voice that speaks. Roman historians, Greek philosophers, Jewish scribes, and even pagan satirists all referenced a man named Jesus—sometimes to attack Him, sometimes to explain the commotion, but always acknowledging His impact.
This article highlights ten of the most compelling non-biblical historical references to Jesus, all dating from the first and second centuries. These are not church documents. They’re not sermons. They’re outside sources—some hostile to Christianity—yet they all point to the same undeniable fact:
Jesus lived. Jesus died. And His followers shook the world.
Here are ten ancient writers who proved it.
1. Tacitus (ca. AD 116)
Tacitus was one of Rome’s greatest historians. He wasn’t a Christian—far from it. But in his work Annals, written around AD 116, he gives one of the most powerful non-Christian confirmations of Jesus’ life and death.
While writing about Nero and the Great Fire of Rome, Tacitus explains how Nero tried to shift the blame:
“Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…”³¹
That’s not a Christian writing. That’s a Roman elite—hostile to the faith—mocking it as a “superstition.” But look at what he admits:
-
Jesus (called Christus) really lived.
-
He was executed under Pontius Pilate, just like in Matthew 27, Mark 15, Luke 23, and John 19.
-
He died during the reign of Tiberius Caesar—same as Luke 3:1 says.
-
His followers didn’t vanish—the message broke out again, even reaching Rome.
-
They were persecuted viciously under Nero, just like early Church tradition and history record.
What’s more, Tacitus says this movement was “checked for the moment”—which likely refers to Jesus’ death—but then it came back to life, just like His followers claimed He did.
No one questions the authenticity of this passage. No scribe tampered with it. No Christian invented it. Tacitus hated Christians—but even he had to admit the facts.
Conclusion: Jesus Was—and Is—Undeniably Real
One by one, these non-Christian sources confirm what the Bible’s been saying all along. And here’s the kicker: even if we didn’t have a single New Testament book, here’s what we could know just from outside sources:
-
Jesus was born to a poor woman; His earthly father was a carpenter.
-
He was a teacher with many disciples.
-
He was known for wisdom, virtue, miracles, and prophecy.
-
He claimed to be God.
-
He was crucified under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius Caesar.
-
Darkness and an earthquake were reported at His death.
-
His disciples claimed He rose from the dead, appeared to them, and showed them His wounds.
-
His followers worshipped Him as God.
-
Their belief in Him caused disturbances, leading to Claudius expelling Jews from Rome.
-
Jesus was such a known figure by the second century that at least seven Roman emperors likely heard His name: Claudius, Nero, Vespasian, Titus, Domitian, Trajan, and Hadrian.
So no, Jesus is not some myth.
He’s one of the best-attested people of the entire first century—even without quoting the Bible.
Forget the blogs. Ignore the clickbait.
Serious historians—Christian or not—don’t question whether Jesus existed.
The real question isn’t did He live…
The real question is: what will you do with the One who died and rose again?
2. Josephus (ca. AD 93)
Flavius Josephus wasn’t a Christian. He was a Jewish-Roman historian, born just a few years after Jesus was crucified. But in his massive historical work, Antiquities of the Jews, he included a now-famous passage known as the Testimonium Flavianum—a reference to Jesus that even critics can’t ignore.²⁵
Now, to be fair, most scholars—Christian or not—agree that the version we’ve had in Greek was probably touched up by a Christian scribe. For example, Josephus probably didn’t write “He was the Christ,” since he never became a follower of Jesus.²⁶
But here’s the kicker: in the 1970s, an Arabic version of this same passage was discovered—and it reads like something a non-Christian Jew would actually write.
“At this time there was a wise man who was called Jesus. His conduct was good, and [he] was known to be virtuous. And many people from among the Jews and the other nations became his disciples.
Pilate condemned him to be crucified and to die. But those who had become his disciples did not abandon his discipleship.
They reported that he had appeared to them three days after his crucifixion, and that he was alive; accordingly he was perhaps the Messiah concerning whom the prophets have recounted wonders.”²⁷
Let’s be clear:
Josephus didn’t believe Jesus was the Messiah. But he confirmed the key points:
-
Jesus was a real man, known for His wisdom and good character. (Just like in Luke 2:52 and John 7:46.)
-
He had Jewish and Gentile followers—exactly what we see in Acts 10 and Matthew 8.
-
He was crucified under Pilate—matching Matthew 27, Mark 15, Luke 23, and John 19.
-
His followers claimed He rose three days later and was seen alive—just like Luke 24 and 1 Corinthians 15:4–6.
-
And Josephus notes they still followed Him, even after His death.
Historian Paul L. Maier said it best:
“Clearly this version of the passage is expressed in a manner appropriate to a non-Christian Jew.”²⁸
But that’s not all.
Josephus mentions Jesus again—in passing—while discussing the death of James:
“…the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ…”²⁹
That’s Josephus, a non-Christian Jew, calling Jesus “the one who was called Christ.” Not claiming it—but not denying the title was attached to Him.
So what do we get from Josephus?
-
A real man named Jesus.
-
Known for wisdom and virtue.
-
Followed by Jews and Gentiles.
-
Crucified by Pilate.
-
Reported to have risen.
-
Still followed even after death.
-
Referred to as “the Christ.”
That’s not Christian propaganda. That’s first-century Jewish history backing up the Gospels.
Even the historian who didn’t believe in Him still wrote His name down.
3. Pliny the Younger (ca. AD 112)
Pliny the Younger wasn’t a preacher. He was a Roman governor of Bithynia around AD 112—and he had a problem: too many Christians. So he wrote to Emperor Trajan asking what to do with them. His letter, Book 10, Letter 96, gives us a goldmine of information about how the Roman government viewed early Christians.
Here’s what Pliny said:
“Others, whose names were given me by an informer, first said that they were Christians and afterwards denied it… They all worshipped your image and the statues of the deities, and cursed the name of Christ.
But they declared that the sum of their guilt or their error only amounted to this: that on a stated day they had been accustomed to meet before daybreak and to recite a hymn to Christ, as though he were a god… their oath was to abstain from theft, robbery, adultery, breach of faith, and not to deny trust money when called upon to deliver it.”²¹
Let that sink in.
-
Pliny tried to get Christians to curse the name of Christ. Why? Because they refused to do it. That means the name of Jesus still carried serious weight, even decades after His death. (Philippians 2:10—“at the name of Jesus every knee should bow.”)
-
They worshipped Jesus as divine—reciting hymns to Him “as to a god.” That’s exactly what we see in John 20:28, when Thomas says, “My Lord and my God.” Or Colossians 1:15–20, where Paul calls Christ the image of the invisible God.
-
They gathered weekly before sunrise. Sound familiar? Acts 20:7 says believers met on “the first day of the week.” They didn’t gather to stir up trouble. They came to worship, pray, and live holy lives.
-
Pliny notes that their oath wasn’t to commit crimes—but to avoid them. Again, that’s straight from Romans 13, 1 Peter 2:12, and Jesus Himself in Matthew 5–7.
And what did Trajan say in response?
Don’t hunt them down—but if they confess Jesus, punish them. If they deny Him, pardon them.²²
In other words, believing in Jesus was enough to get you killed—unless you denied His name.
So what does Pliny confirm?
-
Jesus was known by name.
-
Christians refused to curse Him.
-
They worshipped Him as God.
-
They lived morally.
-
Rome took their faith seriously—so seriously, it became a capital offense.
Pliny wasn’t trying to write Scripture. But his report lines up perfectly with what the Gospels and Acts already told us. And without meaning to, he proves the point:
The early Church worshipped a real Jesus.
And Rome knew it.
4. Suetonius (ca. AD 120)
Suetonius was a Roman historian who didn’t care about theology—he just documented what happened. In his book The Lives of the Caesars, he covered the reigns of the first twelve emperors, from Julius Caesar to Domitian. And when he got to Claudius (who ruled from AD 41 to 54), he dropped a quick line that echoes straight out of Acts 18:2.
Here’s what Suetonius wrote:
“Since the Jews constantly made disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus, he expelled them from Rome.”²³
Let’s get this straight:
“Chrestus” is almost certainly a misspelling of “Christus”—a known issue in Latin at the time. Even early church fathers like Tertullian and Justin Martyr knew “Chrestians” was a common mistake for “Christians.”²⁴
But here’s the key:
Suetonius thought Jesus was alive or stirring things up in Rome—but Jesus had already been crucified years earlier. That means these “disturbances” weren’t caused by Jesus personally, but by arguments over Jesus—just like we see in Acts.
Acts 18:2 says Paul met Aquila and Priscilla in Corinth—“because Claudius had ordered all the Jews to leave Rome.” That’s exactly what Suetonius confirms here.
So what does this little pagan footnote tell us?
-
Jesus—“Christus”—was already a well-known name by AD 49.
-
Debates about Him were serious enough to get Jews expelled from the capital of the empire.
-
Suetonius didn’t question whether Jesus existed—he just mentioned the fallout.
-
The Book of Acts and Roman history match perfectly.
Suetonius wasn’t trying to defend the Gospel.
He wasn’t promoting Jesus.
He was just noting an imperial decision.
But even in that, he backs up what Luke wrote in Acts.
Jesus caused waves.
Even after His death.
And Rome noticed.
5. Mara Bar Serapion (ca. AD 73)
Mara Bar-Serapion wasn’t a Christian. He wasn’t even free. He wrote a letter from prison, sometime after the Romans had destroyed his city and taken him captive. Writing in Syriac to his son, Serapion, he encouraged him to pursue wisdom. But along the way, he dropped a reference that hits hard.
Here’s what he said:
“What else can we say, when the wise are forcibly dragged off by tyrants… What advantage did the Athenians gain by murdering Socrates… or the people of Samos by burning Pythagoras… or the Jews by killing their wise king, because their kingdom was taken away at that very time?
Socrates is not dead, because of Plato; neither is Pythagoras, because of the statue of Juno; nor is the wise king, because of the new laws he laid down.”¹⁹
Let’s be real. He doesn’t say “Jesus” by name—but everything else fits.
-
“Wise king”? The Romans called Jesus that. Luke 23:3—Pilate asked, “Are you the King of the Jews?”
-
The soldiers mocked Him as king—Matthew 27:29.
-
The Jews rejected Him as king—Mark 15:12.
-
And the charge nailed above the cross read: “Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews” (John 19:19).
That title—King of the Jews—was publicly declared at His crucifixion. Mara didn’t need the Gospels to know it. It was common knowledge.
And look at what Mara says next:
“The Jews killed their wise king… and their kingdom was taken away.”
That’s exactly what Jesus warned would happen in Luke 21:6, 24—Jerusalem would fall, and the people would be scattered.
Then Mara writes:
“The wise king is not dead, because of the new laws he laid down.”
Even as a non-Christian, Mara saw something lasting in Jesus—a legacy that outlived death, just like the Gospels claim in Matthew 28, Acts 1, and everywhere the apostles preached.
J. Warner Wallace sums it up well:
“Jesus was a wise and influential man who died for His beliefs. The Jewish leadership was somehow responsible. And His followers lived out His teaching.”
So what do we have here?
-
A pagan prisoner.
-
No New Testament in sight.
-
No theological motive.
-
Just raw observation: Jesus was wise, killed, and remembered. His people scattered. His words endured.
Even from a jail cell, truth leaks out.
Even without saying “Jesus,” Mara made it clear who he was talking about.
And he called Him exactly what Pilate did:
“The King.”
6. Thallus (ca. AD 55)
The earliest known non-Christian writer to mention the events around Jesus’ death may be Thallus. His original writings are gone, but Julius Africanus, writing around AD 220, quoted him—and Georgius Syncellus, a Byzantine historian (ca. AD 800), preserved that quote in his Chronicle.
Julius was commenting on the darkness that covered the land during Jesus’ crucifixion—the same event described in Matthew 27:45, Mark 15:33, and Luke 23:44. Here’s what he says:
“On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun.”¹⁴
Now, notice something: Jesus isn’t named directly in this quote. But the event in question—the darkness at noon during Passover—is clearly tied to the crucifixion of Christ. And that’s exactly what Julius Africanus is defending.
Why would Thallus bring this up if Jesus wasn’t the issue? According to scholar Robert Van Voorst:
“Thallus could have mentioned the eclipse with no reference to Jesus. But it is more likely that Julius… was correct in reading it as a hostile reference to Jesus’ death.”¹⁵
In other words, Julius Africanus wasn’t just pulling this out of thin air. He was responding to Thallus, who was trying to explain away the Gospel account—calling it a natural eclipse, instead of divine judgment.
But here’s the problem with Thallus’s theory:
The Passover happens during a full moon, which makes a solar eclipse impossible. Julius points this out. He doesn’t just quote Thallus—he refutes him.
That means by the time Thallus was writing—probably before most of the Gospels were even finished—there were already Christians claiming the sky went dark when Jesus died, and non-Christians trying to shut that claim down.
So what does this tell us?
-
There was a known tradition—even outside the Bible—that darkness struck the land during Jesus’ death.
-
Thallus knew about it and felt the need to explain it.
-
Julius Africanus saw that explanation as shallow and defended the biblical account.
This isn’t legend. It’s historical friction—real people debating real events. That’s not how myths work. That’s how history works.
7. Phlegon (ca. AD 140)
Some references to Jesus come from books that no longer exist—but that’s no problem for historians. Ancient writers often quoted each other, and many “lost” works are still known because later authors preserved parts of them. One of those is Phlegon of Tralles, a historian from the second century. His work is gone, but Origen, writing in the third century, quoted him—and what he said matches what the Gospels already tell us.
Origen wrote:
“Now Phlegon, in the thirteenth or fourteenth book, I think, of his Chronicles, not only ascribed to Jesus a knowledge of future events… but also testified that the result corresponded to His predictions.”¹¹
Compare that with John 13:19 and Matthew 24, where Jesus speaks of things to come, saying He tells them beforehand so that when it happens, people will believe. Phlegon, not a Christian, confirms that Jesus had a reputation for knowing the future—and getting it right.
Origen also records this from Phlegon:
“And with regard to the eclipse in the time of Tiberius Caesar, in whose reign Jesus appears to have been crucified, and the great earthquakes which then took place, Phlegon too, I think, has written in the thirteenth or fourteenth book of his Chronicles.”¹²
That lines up with Matthew 27:45-51, which says that during Jesus’ crucifixion, darkness came over the land and the earth quaked. Phlegon notes both events—darkness and earthquakes—during the reign of Tiberius, the same time the Gospels place the crucifixion.
Then Origen gives one more quote:
“We have in the preceding pages made our defense, according to our ability, adducing the testimony of Phlegon, who relates that these events took place at the time when our Saviour suffered. And he goes on to say, that ‘Jesus, while alive, was of no assistance to himself, but that he arose after death, and exhibited the marks of his punishment, and showed how his hands had been pierced by nails.’”¹³
That last part sounds almost exactly like John 20:27, where Jesus tells Thomas to touch His nail-pierced hands. Phlegon, again not a Christian, repeats the same idea: that Jesus died, rose, and showed the marks of crucifixion afterward.
So what do we have here? A pagan historian repeating key details the Gospel writers recorded—darkness, earthquakes, crucifixion under Tiberius, resurrection, and nail marks. Phlegon didn’t write Scripture, but he echoed what the Church was already preaching—and what the Apostles saw firsthand.
8. Lucian of Samosata (ca. AD 166)
Lucian of Samosata wasn’t a historian or theologian—he was a Greek satirist, known for mocking anything sacred. But even in his mockery, he couldn’t help but confirm key facts about Jesus and the early Christians. Writing sometime after AD 165 in his work The Death of Peregrine, Lucian takes a jab at the Christians:
“The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day—the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account…. These misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains the contempt of death and voluntary self-devotion… it was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws.”¹⁸
Let’s break it down:
-
“Worship a man… who was crucified” — That lines up with Mark 15 and John 19. Jesus wasn’t just executed—He was worshiped afterward. Even His enemies knew that.
-
“Introduced their novel rites” — Sounds a lot like baptism and communion, introduced by Christ Himself (Matthew 28:19, Luke 22:19–20).
-
“They are all brothers once converted” — That’s exactly how the early Church spoke. See Acts 2:42–47 and Galatians 3:28. No Jew or Greek, slave or free—they were family in Christ.
-
“Deny the gods of Greece” — True again. The early Christians rejected idol worship, just as Paul preached in Acts 17.
-
“Worship the crucified sage” — That says it all. Even Lucian couldn’t deny that Christians believed Jesus—crucified and rejected—was divine.
Now keep in mind: Lucian hated Christianity. He wasn’t trying to promote the Gospel. He was ridiculing it. But in doing so, he confirmed some of the very core facts of the New Testament:
-
Jesus was crucified.
-
He had disciples who worshiped Him as divine.
-
He taught laws for living.
-
He created a spiritual family.
-
His followers rejected idols and suffered for what they believed.
So what’s the takeaway?
Lucian laughed at Christianity—but he didn’t say it was made up.
He mocked the Christians—but admitted they were devoted to a real person who was crucified.
He rejected the faith—but couldn’t ignore the facts.
Even the satirists help build the case.
9. Celsus (ca. 175 AD)
Celsus was a second-century Greek philosopher who couldn’t stand Christianity. Around AD 175, he wrote a hit piece called The True Doctrine—a full-blown attack on the faith. His book didn’t survive, but we know what he said because Origen, a Christian scholar, wrote a massive rebuttal called Against Celsus about 75 years later. That tells us something: Celsus’s book stuck around long enough—and had enough influence—that Christians had to answer it publicly.
Celsus used a clever literary device: he wrote as if a Jew was debating Jesus face-to-face. Origen called it childish and inconsistent, but he still took the time to quote it and refute it point by point. Here’s what Celsus claimed:
“[Celsus] accuses [Jesus] of having invented his birth from a virgin, and upbraids Him with being born in a certain Jewish village, of a poor woman… who was turned out by her husband, a carpenter by trade, because she was convicted of adultery… After being driven away, she gave birth to Jesus, an illegitimate child, who worked in Egypt, learned magical powers, returned home proud of them, and by using them claimed to be a god.”¹⁷
Let’s unpack that.
-
Virgin birth? Celsus mocks it—but still admits it’s part of the tradition. Compare that with Matthew 1:23 and Luke 1:34–35.
-
Born in a poor village to a poor woman? That’s Luke 2:7. No palace. No luxury. Just a manger.
-
Accusation of illegitimacy? Not new. John 8:41 has Jesus’ enemies throwing similar shade: “We were not born of fornication…”
-
Joseph was a carpenter? See Matthew 13:55.
-
Went to Egypt? Matthew 2:13–15 says so—though Celsus twists it into a myth of learning magic.
-
Miraculous powers? He dismisses them as Egyptian sorcery—but still admits they were known. The Gospels call them miracles (Mark 1:34, Luke 7:22).
-
Claimed to be divine? Exactly what got Jesus crucified in John 19:7.
Celsus tried to discredit Jesus. But look at what his own smear campaign confirms: Jesus was born poor, His mother was claimed to be a virgin, He lived in Nazareth, His father was a carpenter, He did miracles, He was seen as divine, and He didn’t fade into obscurity.
And even Celsus knew it.
Now, sure—we have to be cautious when judging quotes that come secondhand. But Origen wasn’t dumb. If he misrepresented Celsus, no one would’ve taken Against Celsus seriously. So it’s safe to say he quoted him accurately.
So even the haters of Jesus—in trying to tear Him down—end up verifying what the Gospels say. Mock all you want, Celsus. You just proved the story is real.
10. Early Christian Writers (ca. 50-157)
Christianity exploded across the Roman world within a hundred years of Jesus’ life. That doesn’t happen if He never existed. A big part of the historical proof comes from the early Christian writers—men who either knew the Apostles or were trained by those who did. And what did they write about? The same Jesus you read about in the Gospels—His teachings, His death, and the belief that He rose again.
Take Clement of Rome, writing around AD 70–96. In his letter to the Corinthians (preserved in the Codex Alexandrinus), he talks about the teachings of Jesus (13:1), His death (21:6), and His resurrection (24:1). That matches 1 Corinthians 15—Paul’s early summary of the Gospel—and lines up with all four Gospel accounts.
Then there’s Ignatius of Antioch (around AD 110). In his letter to the Smyrnaeans, he says:
“Jesus was crucified under Pontius Pilate and Herod the Tetrarch… He suffered all these things for us; and He suffered them really, and not in appearance only… He truly rose again.” (Ch. 1–2)
That hits the exact same timeline and names given in Luke 3:1 and Matthew 27—Pilate, Herod, crucifixion, real death, real resurrection.
Polycarp, another key figure (AD 110–140), wrote to the Philippians about Jesus’ life and death (1:2). According to early sources, Polycarp had direct contact with the Apostle John. That puts him one step away from the source—and still affirming the same message as John 19.
Justin Martyr, writing around AD 155–157, in his First Apology, says Jesus was a teacher, was crucified, died, and rose again (Ch. 21). That lines up with John 3, Mark 15, and Luke 24.
Papias (AD 95–110) wrote that he learned Jesus’ teachings directly from those who heard Jesus speak. That makes his testimony secondhand—but extremely close to the original events, just like Luke 1:2, where Luke says he got his information from eyewitnesses.
Quadratus, writing to Emperor Hadrian (AD 117–138), defends Christianity by pointing to the miracles of Jesus:
“Those who were healed and raised from the dead… were also always present… some of them lived even to our day.”
That’s a direct echo of John 11 (Lazarus) and Luke 7 (the widow’s son)—people who didn’t just get healed but were seen walking around afterward.
And even earlier than all of them is the Didache (AD 50–70), a Christian manual for new believers. It includes commands from Jesus, ethical teachings, and instructions for communion—remembering His death and resurrection. Sounds a lot like Matthew 5–7 (Sermon on the Mount) and Luke 22:19 (the Last Supper).
These early Christian writers didn’t make up a new religion. They were passing on what they had received—straight from the Apostles. And they all point to the same facts found in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John:
Jesus lived.
Jesus taught.
Jesus was crucified under Pontius Pilate.
Jesus rose again.
The next section will move to non-Christian sources—people who had zero reason to promote Jesus or His followers. And guess what? Even they confirmed the same core facts.
